Skip to main content

Gay Hooky Day


Sorry to disappoint my fellow homos, some of which will no doubt be on board with this whole deal and probably even participating, and fabulous best wishes for them all. You go, boys and girls!

But this "calling in gay day" for tomorrow is just flat out embarrassing to me personally. Exactly how is this making any point supporting the gay marriage thing, the impetus for this entire nationwide game plan? Ah, that's right, it doesn't really at all.

It accomplishes nothing toward that end, of course, despite that being the original issue providing the instigators their Eureka! moment of deciding to rally together all workerbee Ls, Gs, Bs and Ts to validate just how reliant their companies are on them showing up in order to stay afloat... the "Day Without a Gay" scheduled for maƱana I suppose is meant to make at least that much clear.

But a stupid approach and bad idea overall just the same. Mostly meaningless, though, are the extraneous bits of the planned queer day off too, aside from playing hooky a day out from the cubicle, the not going online, the no watching of television nor switching on the lights, and withdrawing from our bank accounts all of $80 to pocket for the day so the banks can't exploit our gay wads ... yeah, that'll make a difference. Why eighty a magic number I have no clue.

Not to mention that the gay issue thingy in lots of workplaces, still reason enough to be sent packing for a permanent vacation outside the office. Don't ask, certainly don't tell. Calling in absentia for tomorrow citing boy-boy or girl-girl affinity might could be enough for being granted time off forever with no more needing to call in at all.

Of course, to confirm the Rainbow Brigade's worthiness on this arbitrary sabbatical, in addition to making whatever weak attempt at denting an already crashed economy by skipping out work (blue on black, tears on a river, but gosh darn it you couldn't go down without us on board!) we are all expected to spend the time instead not at work nor sucking up electrons at home, but rather with our duly withdrawn 80 bucks in pocket (?) making some sort of difference volunteering around town.

Nothing wrong with that in theory, I suppose, voluntarism always a good thing. But seriously, if it is in anyone's constitution helping out in their own community or offering up magnanimous good will they are probably already involved somehow, and most likely planning to use this day off as an excuse to just sleep in. The majority of others not so charitably inclined at any other time, well, snoozing too.

Bottom line is that this is a stupid ass idea from the get go, proves no point nor achieves any objective to speak of as far as I can tell, and certainly a worthless demonstration against or for whatever gay cause I have no idea about.

The most that perhaps might be expected is possibly a next day Thursday of well-rested and less bitchy than usual ten percent workforce. That might be worth it after all, I suppose, the only upside I can consider for this otherwise inconsequential display.

Comments

  1. You just crack me up sometimes, Doug. I chuckled all the way through this one. Being in management, I'm afraid I don't understand this thing. Every one of my employmees is important to me. People are the backbone of what we do. Sure wish some other way would be chosen to make the point.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I was in management most of my career, I'd have just been pissed off. At least it was only one day. I had a manager who reported to me who called in monthly with cramps, not that maybe that not true, but really, I even offered to buy some Midol for her. Like clockwork every 28 days her calls, me having to pick up whatever deadline being her Director. Maybe that's why this kind of stuff annoys me.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I Think

I think I'm bored blogging. I think I'm done with it. I think what's the point? I think you should check out my blogroll instead. I think they say stuff better anyway.

Betty White "needs to start taking her relationship with God serious." Seriously?

I was one of those grassroots Facebook campaigners responsible for Betty White hosting Saturday Night Live the other night, so for that, let me just say: "You're very welcome!" I thought she was fantastic, better even than I had expected she might be, and by most accounts her coming on the show was a huge success. Except for some, who apparently had more eternal concerns weighing on their minds, precluding enjoying it so much. Like Jose, who while conceding that Betty White is legend "in this day and age of rebels and rockers" (I really don't know what that means, but it seems to be a good thing), is more concerned about her afterlife appearance instead, presumably being so old as she is. A legend, sure ... "However, I think Betty really needs to start taking her relationship with God serious. Betty can't please this new generation, she has nothing to prove to them. Her relationship with the Lord is what she needs to take serious." Well, all...

Why's There Even You and Me? A Personal Diversion

Obama still ba-rocks and McCain still, um ... is a dick. Okay. That's the extent of my political rumination today. Although I may be totally off on both counts, I wouldn't know. I honestly paid zero attention to realpolitik today so I have no clue what might have happened really. I have other more personal and most disconcerting things on my mind. I'm kind of creeped out. I have a stalker ... don't laugh. I really do. I think his name is Mike but I'm not even sure about that. He was probably lying when I asked, whatever the hell it was he said, but that's what I think I remember. I was drunk at the time. Admittedly my fault. I'm an idiot sometimes, no new tale to tell there. I don't recall exactly how I met the guy in the first place - it was a couple of years ago - but I do know that I willingly gave up my address. With directions, no less. Just in case. Damn the hooch. What was I thinking? Anyway, so here's the deal. I had him over a time or two ea...