Skip to main content

Unedited Anti-War Big Block of Text

I am so anti-war it's not even funny. Even the Afghanistan debacle, and I know Obama intends to amp that one up but at least to maybe get it over with, too, sooner than later once we get our ass out of Iraq where it ought not ever have been in the first place.

Personally, I think going into Afghanistan even for bin Laden was a mistake. I know, I know, war on terror, blah blah, and he's a bad guy and everything. Orchestrated killing three thousand give or take, innocent American lives. Well, we certainly have trumped that by oodles the wiping out of innocent civilians, huh? Not to mention the adding to our own U.S. of A. tally of the dead.

Maybe I just don't understand collateral damage so much. But rather than destroying a country and every regional commoner being on constant alert to maybe be smattered at any moment, I just think there should be a better way. Maybe society is so fucked up there isn't any other option anymore, the world history of warring kind of proves that point I suppose.

Sure, self-defense is one thing, but I would think that would be getting rid of the bad guys, only. Send in some ground troops or whatever, set up some intelligence operation or what the hell might be needed, but until you know wherever the baddies might be running to or hiding out, let everyone else the fuck alone.

No wonder the masses in so many places around the world hate on America, can't say that I blame them so much. Not to mention that the more we piss them off, the longer the line of terrorist wannabe recruits lining up to get even. Some war on terror, that, rather counter-productive it seems, but that's the way the game is played out I guess. Always has been, I know.

Still, if for just once we'd maybe shut up our American-as-apple-pieholes and try finding the bad guys only with no reason for nearby faultless others' handwringing we might could possibly set a better example. To me, war just makes absolutely no common sense. None whatsoever.

Think what you will, and argue however it might sometimes be justified, if any reasoning can be made as for why, even if I do understand, it's just a concept I'll never buy into. Whatever purpose.

To me it's like claiming to know that some nefarious culprit might be lurking in my own neighborhood, so thumbs up for vaporizing the entire block just in case. Even though he'll probably manage to get away, of course. Or he could be possibly in that apartment complex, blowing that to smithereens totally justified. Keep it up until someday maybe Lady Luck will finally offer up the bad guy dead.

The rest, just collateral damage. Lots of others around the hood, though, no doubt totally pissed off by then, wanting revenge. Stupid shit, war. My opinion, one of those issues bandied about and which I see both sides but also one that never will my slant on it change.

Comments

  1. I really enjoyed reading this. Has the desire to KILL bin Laden (you hear much less about capturing him and putting him on trial) become so much politically correct posturing? Is vengence as American as apple pie? If we find and KILL bin Laden, will that end the war on terror?

    Look at the enormous human toll our efforts to have Saddam killed has taken. Was it worth it just to settle a president's personal vendetta?

    Collateral damage has seemingly become an acceptable fact of life. But not with me. I believe that impure hands will never be able to perform pure deeds.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you, Doug. At least I know I'm not alone in my way of thinking of things. I totally agree. I didn't bother to edit, actually just did the podcast rant first and then kind of mostly just transcribed it, never really a good idea, so I know it sucks, but my point was made. Thanks again, I appreciate the comment, spot on.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It doesn't matter to me if they capture or kill Bin Laden. Either one works for me. I do think that we need more troops in Afghanistan, I also think that we have to try to eliminate the Al Qaeda training camps and the Taliban. Not only for our security but also for the security of other nations.

    Bush made the mistake, by going into Iraq and not staying in Afghanistan.
    I think P-e Obama knows what has to be done and I support him 100 percent.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Yeah, too bad Obama left with having to clean up the mess there. I'm confident he'll do what needs to be done with more troops in Afghanistan, and I support him in that respect, just too bad in my opinion that's the only option at this point because it has been handled so badly from the start.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Georgia outlaws microchip implants: "Just imagine having a beeper in your rectum and your beeper numbers displayed on billboards throughout the city."

Well, that bill passed, the one from Georgia "so as to prohibit requiring a person to be implanted with a microchip," Senate Bill 235 . At least it made its way through the House Judiciary Committee, anyway, next stop the House Rules Committee that decides whether it moves on to the full House vote and (fingers crossed) final passage. I'd think it probably should, taking into account the compelling testimony brought up at this last hearing, from some fat lady about why non-consensual chipping should be made against the law. There she described in detail her own personal experience, with being implanted against her druthers: "I'm also one of the people in Georgia who has a microchip," she began. ("Also one?" There's more of them there?) She went on about the specific disadvantages, how it violates one's "right to work without being tortured by co-workers who are activating these microchips by using their cell phones and other electro

I Think

I think I'm bored blogging. I think I'm done with it. I think what's the point? I think you should check out my blogroll instead. I think they say stuff better anyway.

Hung on the Cross

So what, I'm not very mature for my age. I don't care, I'm easily amused because of it, and I enjoy being amused. Like this picture of a crucifix which was hoisted a couple of months ago above the main altar at the St. Charles Borromeo Catholic church in Oklahoma: I can come up with lots of hilariously inappropriate captions here, some that even I am embarrassed to admit thinking up, despite my unabashed crudity. I would share but probably everyone else is too sophisticated to see the humor. Plus, I really don't want to go to Hell. I'm guessing that there are an awful lot of Okie parishioners down there at the church where this is hung for real, who I reckon wouldn't appreciate my sense of humor about it, either. They are, in general, hugely offended by it instead, because they see nothing funny whatsoever about displaying Jesus' ginormous penis in church, not in the least bit! Seems as though this has caused quite a "deep divide" among members o