Skip to main content

Fuck Viacom

Hey, corporate Viacomic assholes. Save yourselves some time wading through that undoubtedly exhaustive court-mandated turned in YouTube viewer roster.

My log-in ID is "scorpiokc," and my IP address is 75.87.110.228.

And just in case the password might come in handy, too, that would be "lebanon." Hope that helps to track me down. You're welcome.

Of the 5,634 videos I've watched to date, I'm sure I've probably been party to infringement of some copyright or another. So I surrender.

Bring it on, bitches. I'll be here waiting, albeit still watching.
"Google must divulge the viewing habits of every user who has ever watched any video on YouTube, a US court has ruled.

"The ruling comes as part of Google's legal battle with Viacom over allegations of copyright infringement.

"The viewing log, which will be handed to Viacom, contains the log-in ID of users, the computer IP address and video clip details.

"While the legal battle between the two firms is being contested in the US, it is thought the ruling will apply to YouTube users and their viewing habits everywhere."
Does this piss anyone else off besides me? Or maybe just another of my nicotine withdrawal symptoms kicking in. Stupid shit, though.

[UPDATE: That really was my password. Before I came to my senses and realized my own stupidity in giving that out. I can be an idiot sometimes. I've changed it now. The log-in ID and IP address still are good to go, though. Guess that's all they really need anyway.]

Comments

  1. I heard about that too. Wow! big brother is all over the place. I made a video using a song, and I was contacted by the artists management. They told me that although It was clearly a violation, the artists liked the video and I could keep it up. I'll e-mail you the name of the artist.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hell yes, it pisses me off too. It isn't nicotine withdrawals - which habit, by the way, I am thrilled you are out to kick ... much luck with it. I'm outraged not just at this ruling, but by all the incidences where our privacy is being compromised.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I would be more pissed off, but Jesse Helms died today and that is buffering it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I hadn't heard about this before, so I was outraged really, and that truly was my password! Then realized that was totally stupid, I've changed that part now. The rest of the info still true. What made me really pissed was not the friggin' legal goings on between Google and Viacom, fight it out, y'all. I'd even understand maybe those coming into play, altho I'd disagree, like Rain who posted videos and stuff. But really, the ID of everyone who has ever even so much as viewed a video, along with all their videos of choice? Screw that.

    Thanks, Doug, for the support on the no-smoking thing. Gotta do it.

    To Diane's comment, all I can say is that is that I do agree that Helm's story should have been a buffer, I unfortunately hadn't heard the good news before going overboard in annoyance at this youtube thing first.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Wow...that is just plain freaky scary.

    I here I just recently learned how to make videos. I'd freak if an artist or company contacted me. I'm just a music lover who enjoys her "Speilberg" moments...

    ReplyDelete
  6. It's not even about the videos you make, it's about tracking whatever the heck you've maybe ever watched. That's the most of the ridiculousness really. Be careful in your Spielberg projects, I just might happen to watch, and then we'd both be indicted.

    ReplyDelete
  7. It will be a cold day in hell when I am afraid of lawyers. Screw them.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Diane, a woman after my own heart! Fuck 'em.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Georgia outlaws microchip implants: "Just imagine having a beeper in your rectum and your beeper numbers displayed on billboards throughout the city."

Well, that bill passed, the one from Georgia "so as to prohibit requiring a person to be implanted with a microchip," Senate Bill 235 . At least it made its way through the House Judiciary Committee, anyway, next stop the House Rules Committee that decides whether it moves on to the full House vote and (fingers crossed) final passage. I'd think it probably should, taking into account the compelling testimony brought up at this last hearing, from some fat lady about why non-consensual chipping should be made against the law. There she described in detail her own personal experience, with being implanted against her druthers: "I'm also one of the people in Georgia who has a microchip," she began. ("Also one?" There's more of them there?) She went on about the specific disadvantages, how it violates one's "right to work without being tortured by co-workers who are activating these microchips by using their cell phones and other electro

I Think

I think I'm bored blogging. I think I'm done with it. I think what's the point? I think you should check out my blogroll instead. I think they say stuff better anyway.

Hung on the Cross

So what, I'm not very mature for my age. I don't care, I'm easily amused because of it, and I enjoy being amused. Like this picture of a crucifix which was hoisted a couple of months ago above the main altar at the St. Charles Borromeo Catholic church in Oklahoma: I can come up with lots of hilariously inappropriate captions here, some that even I am embarrassed to admit thinking up, despite my unabashed crudity. I would share but probably everyone else is too sophisticated to see the humor. Plus, I really don't want to go to Hell. I'm guessing that there are an awful lot of Okie parishioners down there at the church where this is hung for real, who I reckon wouldn't appreciate my sense of humor about it, either. They are, in general, hugely offended by it instead, because they see nothing funny whatsoever about displaying Jesus' ginormous penis in church, not in the least bit! Seems as though this has caused quite a "deep divide" among members o