Skip to main content

Propaganda 101

The United States does do one thing really well, to be sure. As a nation, we have honed to the sharpest our propagandist skills, our leadership maybe the most effective anywhere in pounding into our nation's collective head how superordinate is America.

Of course, it's the way of the world that all countries' powers-that-be undertake to control their people's opinion. Others for the most part just do it less competently than we. To really know propaganda, a study of American technique would serve those leaders well.

American propaganda is more clever, playing more so on emotional draw. It doesn’t depend on a reason that one might be inclined to readily disprove, it appeals rather to things no one would possibly off the bat object to.

Well-spun slogans and catchphrases work well keeping one from thinking so far as to rationalize. Roosevelt's Social Security Act and Four Freedoms address, Wilson's Safe For Democracy appeal, Bush's War On Terror declaration, who would be against any one of those just on the expression of it even? It's all in the branding.

Not to suggest of course, that everything so effectively promoted is bad, not at all. What is bad is when such gifted propagandists brand whatever issue with so much subtle positivity, that it precludes any propensity toward reasoning by the audience.

Propaganda for Dummies: Know that to be good it must not appeal to rationality.

Propaganda in some other less savvy countries, though, is just too much in-your-face. Straightaway from the beginning one can easily distinguish it as a mess of lousy propaganda, bringing up a thesis that could possibly be confuted.

Which would explain the extended protesting and insurrection elsewhere in the world by the masses exhibiting opposition to perceived questionable policies and orders of business in their neck of the woods.

Questionable and duly questioned, because those in charge pushing whatever decrees are not as ingenious as we are at figuring out how to better convince their subjects to blindly and quietly buckle under.

And I've gone on far too long, I feel without even really making my point. It's not about what might be right or what might be wrong, it's about the not thinking of most people over here. The thoughtless American simply buying in.

I might personally agree or disagree with this group or that one here at home, who dares to raise a ruckus regarding a specific matter. But at least I can respect and take account of their calling into question the substance of all the pretty words.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Don't Ask, Don't Tell - Just Do It

Like most other gay folks, I was gratified the other night to hear President Obama announce at the State of the Union address his intention to put repealing Don't Ask, Don't Tell on the agenda for 2010. Of course we were all hyped when we heard it the first time, too. Back when he was pandering the rainbow coalition for votes during his campaign, pledging to be a "fierce advocate" for LGBT rights. To start working toward getting rid of DADT during his first year as president was part of that promise. Not that he has totally snubbed us, I guess, but tagging him a "fierce advocate" is probably a stretch . It's really little wonder that much of the queer community reacted approvingly, but also with a fair amount of skepticism, the other night after hearing him vow again to do what he vowed once before with nothing gotten done so far. This DADT thing, I wouldn't think, should be such a big ordeal to get over and done with in short order. Even military p...

Why's There Even You and Me? A Personal Diversion

Obama still ba-rocks and McCain still, um ... is a dick. Okay. That's the extent of my political rumination today. Although I may be totally off on both counts, I wouldn't know. I honestly paid zero attention to realpolitik today so I have no clue what might have happened really. I have other more personal and most disconcerting things on my mind. I'm kind of creeped out. I have a stalker ... don't laugh. I really do. I think his name is Mike but I'm not even sure about that. He was probably lying when I asked, whatever the hell it was he said, but that's what I think I remember. I was drunk at the time. Admittedly my fault. I'm an idiot sometimes, no new tale to tell there. I don't recall exactly how I met the guy in the first place - it was a couple of years ago - but I do know that I willingly gave up my address. With directions, no less. Just in case. Damn the hooch. What was I thinking? Anyway, so here's the deal. I had him over a time or two ea...

Anal Sex How-to (!) is why Gay Marriage is Wrong (?)

I find a lot of things funny, but I don't usually really laugh about them; even my online LOLs are fake more often than not, I'll admit. But honestly, who can possibly resist, at the very least, to giggle here? "We're talking about taking the penis of one man and putting it into the rectum of another man and wiggling it around in excrement. And you have to think, I'm not sure, would I allow that to be done to me?" LOL, and I really do mean it this time, even the "OL" part. I'm not sure it would be quite as funny without the video to go along with that, so I am posting it below just in case. You've probably seen it already. It seems to have gone viral, this video of New Hampshire's state representative Nancy Elliott explaining anal sex to the dimwitted ones in session there with her, arguing for why the state's same-sex marriage law should be repealed, five weeks after its passing . It's hardly worth mentioning that she is Rep...