Skip to main content

One Bad Apple

It's not because I'm a smoker that this chaps my hide, I'm not being biased here. I just personally think this goes beyond stupid. It's not new news but I don't get the cable here, pretty sure that's why I missed this when it was breaking.

In particular what gets at me, how smoking around your Mac computer may be hazardous to your warranty.

According to this article from the Consumerist, in at least two different cases Apple has voided the manufacturer's warranty and refused to provide repair service on the computers, because of them having been exposed to cigarette smoke.

Plainly coming into contact with the residue accumulated inside the computer of a smoker is a health risk and a bio-hazard, and on that note in both instances the Apple customers were duly dismissed, denied service despite having time left on a valid warranty.

In one case citing that due to the computer having been used in a house where there was smoking, that voided the warranty and they would not be able to work on the machine due to "health risks of second hand smoke."

In the other, after five days of Apple hanging on to the computer, the customer called, to be informed that the computer could not be worked on because it was contaminated with cigarette smoke which they deemed a "bio-hazard."

Apple is determinedly sticking to its guns, citing nicotine on OSHA's list of hazardous substances that could damage the health of someone exposed to it. A list which by the way also includes sucrose, talc and rubbing alcohol.

You can differ with me, of course, thinking how dumbass this is. Argue your point however much and for whatever reasons why. It's absurd on the face of it to me, but to that point we can agree to disagree.

However, I think no one could deny that Apple's failure to mention that the machine being used in a smoking environment voids the warranty anywhere in its terms of service, is way out of line. But understandable, perhaps, since doing so just might make them appear incredibly stupid.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Georgia outlaws microchip implants: "Just imagine having a beeper in your rectum and your beeper numbers displayed on billboards throughout the city."

Well, that bill passed, the one from Georgia "so as to prohibit requiring a person to be implanted with a microchip," Senate Bill 235 . At least it made its way through the House Judiciary Committee, anyway, next stop the House Rules Committee that decides whether it moves on to the full House vote and (fingers crossed) final passage. I'd think it probably should, taking into account the compelling testimony brought up at this last hearing, from some fat lady about why non-consensual chipping should be made against the law. There she described in detail her own personal experience, with being implanted against her druthers: "I'm also one of the people in Georgia who has a microchip," she began. ("Also one?" There's more of them there?) She went on about the specific disadvantages, how it violates one's "right to work without being tortured by co-workers who are activating these microchips by using their cell phones and other electro

I Think

I think I'm bored blogging. I think I'm done with it. I think what's the point? I think you should check out my blogroll instead. I think they say stuff better anyway.

Hung on the Cross

So what, I'm not very mature for my age. I don't care, I'm easily amused because of it, and I enjoy being amused. Like this picture of a crucifix which was hoisted a couple of months ago above the main altar at the St. Charles Borromeo Catholic church in Oklahoma: I can come up with lots of hilariously inappropriate captions here, some that even I am embarrassed to admit thinking up, despite my unabashed crudity. I would share but probably everyone else is too sophisticated to see the humor. Plus, I really don't want to go to Hell. I'm guessing that there are an awful lot of Okie parishioners down there at the church where this is hung for real, who I reckon wouldn't appreciate my sense of humor about it, either. They are, in general, hugely offended by it instead, because they see nothing funny whatsoever about displaying Jesus' ginormous penis in church, not in the least bit! Seems as though this has caused quite a "deep divide" among members o