Skip to main content

Still Cruising Along in Haiti

No matter how the head persons at Royal Caribbean might try to legitimize this, it is just way too out of line for defending. That's my opinion, anyway. Here's the deal.

Only sixty miles from the absolute destruction and carnage on account of last week's earthquake, Royal Caribbean's luxury liners are still queued up for letting their guests get their party on at the Labadee Beach resort in Haiti.

Cutting loose and enjoying such watersports like jet skiing and parasailing, grooving on barbecues and shopping sprees, rum cocktails brought directly hammockside, and never minding not so far away the bulldozed mass graves, buildings brought to dust, the dying without food or water, the buried alive...

One passenger said he was sickened by it all. "I just can't see myself sunning on the beach, playing in the water, eating a barbecue, and enjoying a cocktail while there are tens of thousands of dead people being piled up on the streets, with the survivors stunned and looking for food and water."

Another said it was hard enough to picnic there even before, knowing that even under best of times so many Haitians were starving. "I can't imagine having to choke down a burger there now." Ya think?

Some booked on ships scheduled to stop at Labadee are mostly spooked that the people there might be so desperate as to barge in through the high fences made to keep them out, to get at the food and drink. Others were determined to enjoy their holiday whatever goes on. "I'll be there on Tuesday and I plan on enjoying my zip line excursion as well as the time on the beach," said one prick.

Back to those at the top arguing support for why it's all good...

To feel better about it, or most likely to make feel better those who might find this a bit disconcerting, they point out that the ships are carrying some food along, too. Forty pallets of rice, beans, powdered milk, water, and canned foods were delivered on the trip last Friday, and more due to come on two later ships.

Also they have pledged to donate proceeds from the stopovers to help the devastated country. Not to mention how that Haiti will benefit from the revenues that are generated from the guests' shopping excursions and such. "Simply put, we cannot abandon Haiti now that they need us most."

I get it, those are not bad things. So long as they have apparently decided to go ahead with business as usual, it's the least they can do really. But give me a break; nobody is presuming that Royal Caribbean would be "abandoning" Haiti if the company would come to the decision instead to forgo landing their party boats there for now, out of particular respect for what is going on.

And the pallets of provisions, however many brought with, the donation of proceeds from the trips and so on... I still can't get it straight in my head that this is in any way justifiable to still keep going there.

Despite their bighearted piggy-backing goods with these vacation pitstops, if they weren't interested merely in pumping up their own coffers, I guarantee they wouldn't still be dropping anchor at port Labadee. It's all about the bottom line, rather than so much about being honorable.

If they really wanted to make good for the people in Haiti, I'm pretty certain they would be quite capable of springing for the cost of the supplies sent along so far, and then some, accompanied also by a corresponding donation to compensate for the travelers' lost economic splurging.

They could afford to. They just aren't so openhanded when the truth of the matter is they simply wouldn't come out as far ahead in the accounting ledger. Like I said, just my opinion, but I consider this crossing the line of bad taste for the sake of greed, despite their propagating an apology of flimsy excuses rationalizing why.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Georgia outlaws microchip implants: "Just imagine having a beeper in your rectum and your beeper numbers displayed on billboards throughout the city."

Well, that bill passed, the one from Georgia "so as to prohibit requiring a person to be implanted with a microchip," Senate Bill 235 . At least it made its way through the House Judiciary Committee, anyway, next stop the House Rules Committee that decides whether it moves on to the full House vote and (fingers crossed) final passage. I'd think it probably should, taking into account the compelling testimony brought up at this last hearing, from some fat lady about why non-consensual chipping should be made against the law. There she described in detail her own personal experience, with being implanted against her druthers: "I'm also one of the people in Georgia who has a microchip," she began. ("Also one?" There's more of them there?) She went on about the specific disadvantages, how it violates one's "right to work without being tortured by co-workers who are activating these microchips by using their cell phones and other electro

I Think

I think I'm bored blogging. I think I'm done with it. I think what's the point? I think you should check out my blogroll instead. I think they say stuff better anyway.

Hung on the Cross

So what, I'm not very mature for my age. I don't care, I'm easily amused because of it, and I enjoy being amused. Like this picture of a crucifix which was hoisted a couple of months ago above the main altar at the St. Charles Borromeo Catholic church in Oklahoma: I can come up with lots of hilariously inappropriate captions here, some that even I am embarrassed to admit thinking up, despite my unabashed crudity. I would share but probably everyone else is too sophisticated to see the humor. Plus, I really don't want to go to Hell. I'm guessing that there are an awful lot of Okie parishioners down there at the church where this is hung for real, who I reckon wouldn't appreciate my sense of humor about it, either. They are, in general, hugely offended by it instead, because they see nothing funny whatsoever about displaying Jesus' ginormous penis in church, not in the least bit! Seems as though this has caused quite a "deep divide" among members o