Skip to main content

Building on Rocky Ground

Benjamin Netanyahu is a bratty little shit. Despite earlier agreeing to stop Israel's land-grab in the West Bank for awhile (giving in to some uncommon U.S. pressure) as a good will gesture toward talking peace again with the Palestinians, the Prime Minister last month doggedly made clear that he has every intention, instead, to keep on building and staying there forever.

He was on board at first, sure, until he wasn't; when the Jews who are already settled there started raising a ruckus about him giving in and stunting their growth, then all of a sudden he is planting trees and making nice, acquiescing that, "Our message is clear: We are planting here, we will stay here, we will build here, this place will be an inseparable part of the state of Israel for eternity."

Well, yay. Never mind that that sort of complicates things, blowing out of the water whatever peace mission Obama's envoy has been on for the past year. Not that it should be very surprising, really; that eternal quagmire over there is never going to be shored up, that's just a fact, no matter how much the U.S. intervenes, at times even pretending to be stern. Leader of the pack George Mitchell should probably just step down now, indeed while his reputation is still somewhat intact.

Apparently, for whatever reasons, we are expected to keep on always trying to straighten out the unmitigable impasse in the Middle East, ignoring the fact that Israel in particular keeps on making the mess even messier by continuing to break international law, taking over where they ought not even be in the first place, and getting away with it, usually with the blessing of the U.S.

They have gotten away with it for so long, in fact, it's little wonder they have become so arrogant about how they choose to do things. Israel's top persons usually have tended to be almighty stubborn pricks, but I suppose that is understandable, seeing how hard they have tried emulating the United States for so long; they don't know how to act any better. No wonder we like them so much, imitation as flattery.

I'm not saying that the Palestinian leadership has made things any better toward fixing things up; they for sure have not. Dunderheads on that side of the fence are just as responsible for fueling the fire and keeping it going. What I am saying, though, is that the Jewish leaders built that fence and started that fire in the first place, arbitrarily pushing out an entire people from their rightful homeland to claim as their own.

I guess we do have an awful lot in common, the U.S. and Israel, what with our records of taking away others' lands because we want it for ourselves, and because we can, and whatever parts we for one reason or another designate for shoving the original hometowners into, eventually deciding we want that, too. Then to wonder why they get so angry and hateful toward us and want us dead. But I digress...

So Netanyahu is being a bratty little shit, like I said, not following through on stopping building up the West Bank as he promised us he would do. But so what? To build or not to build there, what difference that makes toward resolving the multitude of the rest of the atrocities against the Palestinian people means squat. He's a bratty little shit whether or not he had kept his word.

An "A" for effort, perhaps, on the part of Obama and the U.S. for the rare chiding of Israel's behavior, but it's a moot point anyway. It really would make no dent in the situation there, whatever we might try to do. Not to mention that deeming ourselves qualified to set down rules for peacemaking, well, that's kind of laughable on the face of it.

The point is, not until Israel's leadership owns up to its responsibility for perpetuating the goings on in that neck of the woods, accepts their share of the blame, and stops faulting only the Palestinian authorities, resolves to quit flagrantly breaking, and to instead abide by, international law, maybe then that could be a start. I just don't see that happening.

Comments

  1. Excellent post, my friend. You are quite right, I believe, in calling that whole mess an "eternal quagmire." And while it is a very unpopular thing to say, the U. S. does indeed have an undeniable record of grabbing the land of others. Our leaders are so quick to demonize other countries for doing the same things we have done. What about our bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima? Was there ever greater acts of terrorism? Our nation's hypocritical meddling is back of some of the problems we are facing today. So what are the odds that Israel, the U. S. or any nation is going to admit to being an instigator? I don't see it happening.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well put. I have long felt that Israel is the bigger problem and the root of many of the problems in the Middle East. It is quite obvious that Israel is intent upon expanding its borders as it has done since 1968. All of it done under the guise of "protecting" borders. Its military is increasingly coming under the power of the religious fundamentalists, leading to the commission of atrocities against the Palestinians during the recent invasion.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks, Doug. It's a touchy subject but something I think about a lot. And I'm glad you brought up Nagasaki and Hiroshima, too, I completely agree probably the greatest terrorist act. Recently on the anniversary they were speaking on NPR with, or maybe playing old recorded interviews of, I don't know, some first hand involved with that. I have a really hard time respecting them (well, I don't respect them), I don't care whether they were "serving our country" or not. In fact, I am pretty sick of that phrase altogether, even now.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Indeed and, of course, I agree. And it has gone on like this ever since the war in '67 and for whatever reason they continue to get a pass from the US, which I guess is the only pass that matters. Everyone else who sees it for what it is be damned.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Excellent post! It's hard to criticize Israel without f some folks throwing the anti-Semitic stone at you. I've always thought the US should take a more evenhanded approach when it comes to the Israelis and Palestinians.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thanks, and yeah you're right. I've already been told that I probably think Hitler was normal.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I Think

I think I'm bored blogging. I think I'm done with it. I think what's the point? I think you should check out my blogroll instead. I think they say stuff better anyway.

Don't Ask, Don't Tell - Just Do It

Like most other gay folks, I was gratified the other night to hear President Obama announce at the State of the Union address his intention to put repealing Don't Ask, Don't Tell on the agenda for 2010. Of course we were all hyped when we heard it the first time, too. Back when he was pandering the rainbow coalition for votes during his campaign, pledging to be a "fierce advocate" for LGBT rights. To start working toward getting rid of DADT during his first year as president was part of that promise. Not that he has totally snubbed us, I guess, but tagging him a "fierce advocate" is probably a stretch . It's really little wonder that much of the queer community reacted approvingly, but also with a fair amount of skepticism, the other night after hearing him vow again to do what he vowed once before with nothing gotten done so far. This DADT thing, I wouldn't think, should be such a big ordeal to get over and done with in short order. Even military p...

Hung on the Cross

So what, I'm not very mature for my age. I don't care, I'm easily amused because of it, and I enjoy being amused. Like this picture of a crucifix which was hoisted a couple of months ago above the main altar at the St. Charles Borromeo Catholic church in Oklahoma: I can come up with lots of hilariously inappropriate captions here, some that even I am embarrassed to admit thinking up, despite my unabashed crudity. I would share but probably everyone else is too sophisticated to see the humor. Plus, I really don't want to go to Hell. I'm guessing that there are an awful lot of Okie parishioners down there at the church where this is hung for real, who I reckon wouldn't appreciate my sense of humor about it, either. They are, in general, hugely offended by it instead, because they see nothing funny whatsoever about displaying Jesus' ginormous penis in church, not in the least bit! Seems as though this has caused quite a "deep divide" among members o...